Israel on one side; the Muslim World on another!! January 24, 2009
Posted by Double Seven in Indo-Israeli Relationship.trackback
Here is an email about their achievement The last line is quite prophetically precise
The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000 ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world’s population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes worldwide:
> 1988 – Najib Mahfooz
Peace:
> 1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
> 1994 – Yaser Arafat:
> 1990 – Elias James Corey
> 1999 – Ahmed Zewai
> 1960 – Peter Brian Medawar
> 1998 – Ferid Mourad
TOTAL: 7 SEVEN
-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000 Only FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world’s population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
> 1910 – Paul Heyse
> 1927 – Henri Bergson
> 1958 – Boris Pa sternak
> 1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon
> 1966 – Nelly Sachs
> 1976 – Saul Bellow
> 1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
> 1981 – Elias Canetti
> 1987 – Joseph Brodsky
> 1991 – Nadine Gordimer
Peace:
> 1911 – Alfred Fried
> 1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser
> 1968 – Rene Cassin
> 1973 – Henry Kissinger
> 1978 – Menachem Begin
> 1986 – Elie Wiesel
> 1994 – Shimon Peres
> 1994 – Yitzhak Rabin
Physics:
> 1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
> 1906 – Henri Moissan
> 1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
> 1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
> 1910 – Otto Wallach
> 1915 – Richard Willstaetter
> 1918 – Fritz Haber
> 1921 – Albert Einstein
> 1922 – Niels Bohr
> 1925 – James Franck
> 1925 – Gustav Hertz
> 1943 – Gustav Stern
> 1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
> 1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
> 1952 – Felix Bloch
> 1954 – Max Born
> 1958 – Igor Tamm
> 1959 – Emilio Segre
> 1960 – Don ald A. Glaser
> 1961 – Robert Hofstadter
> 1961 – Melvin Calvin
> 1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
> 1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
> 1965 – Richard Phil lips Feynman
> 1965 – Julian Schwinger
> 1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
> 1971 – Dennis Gabor
> 1972 – William Howard Stein
> 1973 – Brian David Joseph son
> 1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
> 1976 – Burton Richter
> 1977 – Ilya Prigogine
> 1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
> 1978 – Peter L Kapitza
> 1979 – Stephen Weinberg
> 1979 – Sheldon Glashow
> 1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
> 1980 – Paul Berg
> 1980 – Walter Gilbert
> 1981 – Roald Hoffmann
> 1982 – Aaron Klug
> 1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
> 1985 – Jerome Karle
> 1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
> 1988 – Robert Huber
> 1988 – Leon Lederman
> 1988 – Melvin Schwartz
> 1988 – Jack Steinberger
> 1989 – Sidney Altman
> 1990 – Jerome Friedman
> 1992 – Rudolph Marcus
> 1995 – Martin Perl
> 2000 – Alan J. Heeger
Economics:
> 1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
> 1971 – Simon Kuznets
> 1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
> 1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
> 1976 – Mil ton Friedman
> 1978 – Herb ert A. Simon
> 1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
> 1985 – Franco Modigliani
> 1987 – Robert M. Solow
> 1990 – Harry Markowitz
> 1 990 – Merton Miller
> 1992 – Gary Becker
> 1993 – Robert Fogel
Medicine:
>1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
>1908 – Paul Erlich
>1914 – Robert Barany
>1922 – Otto Meyerhof
>1930 – Karl Landsteiner
>1931 – Otto Warburg
>1936 – Otto Loewi
>1944 – Joseph Erlanger
>1944 – Herb ert Spencer Gasser
>1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
>1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
>1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
>1952 – Selman Abra ham Waksman
>1953 – Hans Krebs
>1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
>1958 – Joshua Lederberg
>1959 – Arthur Kornberg
>1964 – Konrad Bloch
>1965 – Francois Jacob
>1965 – Andre Lwoff
>1967 – George Wald
>1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
>1969 – Salvador Luria
>1970 – Julius Axelrod
>1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
>1972 – Gerald Maurice Ed elman
>1975 – Howard Martin Temin
>1976 – Baruch S… Blumberg
>1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow
>1978 – Daniel Nathans
>1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
>1984 – Cesar Milstein
>1985 – Michael Stuart Brown
>1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
>1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
>1988 – Gertrude Elion
>1989 – Harold Varmus
>1991 – Erwin Neher
>1991 – Bert Sakmann
>1993 – Richard J. Roberts
>1993 – Phillip Sharp
>1994 – Alfred Gilman
>1995 – Ed ward B. Lewis
TOTAL: 129 – ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY NINE!- In other words, Israel is the nation, or the epitome, of Knowledge, Wisdom, & Tolerance, more importantly!!
The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims!
themselves up in German restaurants. There is NOT one single Jew that
has destroyed a church or a temple. There is NOT a single Jew that
protests by killing people. All their protest are peaceful.
Muslims must ask ‘what can they do for humankind’ before they demand
that humankind respects them!!
Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the
Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more
culpability on Israel ’s part, the following two sentences really say it
all:
more Israel’ -Benjamin Netanyahu
I can only agree with condemning individuals as evil rather than a whole swathe of people.
Also whether a million jews won a nobel prize and no one else won the prize means little. No culture or people are homogenous. To tar everyone with the same brush is unfair.
That’s true.
But I got this as an email from someone.
Plus, I won’t agree with you on the front that I was trying to portray the level of intelligence, wisdom or knowledge that the Arab/ Muslim world has in comparison to the same the Jews have!!
It’s a fact that there have been far more number of Nobel prize winners from the Jew descent than from Muslim descent. How can you not see that?
The per capita Nobel Laureates in the Jewish community is far greater than the Muslim community in the whole world.
Who the hell cares how many Jews or Muslims won Nobel prizes? Moreover, all those Jews are from different countries, which means that this Jews vs. Muslims Nobel prize race, as you have deemed it, could very well be between German Nobel prize winners vs. Chinese Nobel prize winners or some other combination as this has nothing to do with religion but more to do with the availability of resources in the respective countries and the larger picture of how much research goes on there and how advanced that country is, really with the exception of the peace prize. And sorry if I didn’t get the memo, but very few Muslims actually “blame Jews for all their problems,” except the Palestinians regarding whom there is no question of this being true to a considerable extent since they have lived in oppression by the Israelis for a good 60+ years after their land was stolen from them (i.e. Gaza is an open-air prison). Also, very few Muslims are out ” brainwashing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims!” In short, you are a retard and in need of serious psychological help because you have made generalizations in your article so gross that any sane or reasonable reader would reject your conclusions just based on how pathetic and stereotypical they are, calling all Muslims terrorists. You should be ashamed of being an author to this piece. Pathetic.
Kindly disclose your true identity, and we shall talk…
I HIGHLY doubt if Paul is your real name.
–
77
Are you kidding me? Why would I disclose my true identity to you? Why do I even have to? Are you feeling insecure of defending your argument simply because you think “Paul” is not my true identity (just so you can’t leverage off of making more stereotypical conclusions given my race, religion, and beliefs)? This is the fucking internet you hobo. Deal with it.
No, I wasn’t.
I had such experiences in past (at networking websites such as Facebook) where Pakis (Pakistanis) have been very stupidly caught discussing on various Mumbai 26/11 Attack solidarity groups. They had changed their Muslim names to something stupid such as Crystal Eye, Shoot Them, Kashmiri Princess and also many others- with ‘white’ names, etc.
I don’t need to defend anything you moron. I am not a Jew, neither am I, Muslim (well, obviously!).
Why can you change your name?-
1) Just so I would be unable to make stereotypical judgements about you on the basis of your ‘Khan’, ‘Ahmed’, ‘Mohammad’ names.
Your are absolutely spot on in saying that. Because many people in America, many Pakistanis in particular have arouse into being highly insecure in their surroundings within Christians, Hindus and Jews, in particular. I know one instance (and I swear to god I won’t lie)- where my friend (local in Los Angeles) said that he came across a family who is originally from Pakistan. But when they were asked about their background and demography as such, they were quick to point out that they were rather from New Delhi (which is the capital of India). It was later found out that the family actually had immigrated from Lahore in 1980s. Now what do you say of this?-
Many Pakistanis all around the world, it seems have become highly ashamed to disclose their true identity. Many (and I don’t mean to generalize everything now) are of the opinion that Pakistan is a disgraced state (they won’t however, say it in public or something), that the Government has consistently failed to deliver, and there remains increasing insurgency and ‘Talibanization’ of their own nation-state in various parts of their country, among home grown terrorism and a failed economy (IMF recently sanctioned a $7.5 billion dollar loan to save their economy from bankfuptcy).
What do you have to say about this?
Look at your pathetic self resorting to the same habit of making gross generalizations I called you out on – saying “many” instead of “all” doesn’t convince me otherwise that you are a hateful, prejudiced son of a bitch. I hate to break your little bubble here, but for each Pakistani family you write to me about who would rather call themselves Indian because they feel ashamed to be Pakistani, I will give you 100 families who will say that they are proud to be Pakistani or are from a Pakistani background. Don’t bring that shit over here. Just based on the shit quality of your writing skills, I can tell you’re a prejudiced, serious low-life. Though I won’t go so far as to say that your entire race, religion, or ethnicity thinks like that because my critical thinking abilities are nowhere as shit as yours are, I will say that you so far seem to be a person who is basically devoid of thinking about things critically on your own and bent on propagating a lie bringing down people you are so obviously prejudiced against – Muslims and Pakistanis. All your posts and blogs are full of hate for these two national and religious groups. Get real. And get a life. Make something of yourself like the rest of your Indian countrymen instead of wasting away your life creating meaningless blogs and spewing shit out your mouth.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022867.php
“In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?”
Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, chairman Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem (which I hope to be attending).
The speech was sponsored by the Hudson Institute on September 25.
Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new to me.
It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course. Without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario form becoming a reality.
My short lecture consists of 4 parts.
First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.
The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.
But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corner. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.
A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.
Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.
Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.
Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries.
Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.
Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.
Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.
The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim, Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.
Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal, that guide every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world”, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.
Which brings me to my movie, Fitna.
I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes.
Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders, across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack. Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and Pakistan the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.
A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of Fitna.
Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel. Because, very soon, we will get together in its capitol. The best way for a politician in Europe to loose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.
Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders”. Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.
It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam.
This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us. To stand up for centuries of civilization. To defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.”
If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment.
Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries.
Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all smililary-minded parties in Europe. They are fighting the liberal establishment, and are gaining footholds on the political arena, one voter at the time.
Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big. Something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance.
This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of Knesset, we will be able to watch Fitna in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic.
This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support.
This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks tot its location, it is safe from jihad and shaira. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger even greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.
Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed.
These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942:
“Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy”.
“Islam’s conflict with greater humanity is much wider in scope. Historically, Islam’s relationship has been much more conflictual with the pre-Islamic peoples of all creed, color and race—Pagans, Jews and Christians, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Hindus, and Animists—of Arabia, West Asia, Persia, Africa, Central and Southeast Asia, and India. Many of these civilizations have completely succumbed to Islam: they have vanished; estimated 300 hundred million people perished to the sword of Islam, wielded since its birth in Arabia in the 7th century.”
I don’t even know why. Like I don’t even know WHY!!
Instead of concentrating more on my writing skills, it would have been so thoughtful of you if you had concentrated more on its implications!
You are yet another one of those 1970s Pro-Pakistani American trash who still is willing to back Pakistan even in the light of whatever has been exposed off in Pakistan- the Al-Qaeda networks, Pakistan being the epicenter of terrorism, about 3/4ths of all the terror plots unearthed in Britain having roots in Pakistan, about Kashmir insurgency, etc. Why are you so hair brained in calling yourself a true liberal democrat?
The article I have posted is for your kind perusal. I hope you understand the language in it. It is by a Dutch.
PS: Enough of living in disguise; living in denial. Kindly disclose your true identity; kindly come to terms with the pragmatist and realist views and opinions of ‘non-muslims’!
By: Dr. Omar Zia
In the recent past if you have been observing the tussle between the armed forces and the present Government of Turkey you may have felt a little tinge of unease at the apparent ham handedness of Turkish armed forces. The armed forces have come across as quite nervous and doubtful of the intentions of the Government of Prime Minister Erdogan. He has been accused of trying to endanger secularism in Turkey by sneaking Islam in Turkey through the back door. Being a firm believer in equal rights for all points of view I certainly felt uneasy about it all until I remembered the recent history of my own country.
In 1947 when Muhammad Ali Jinnah proclaimed Pakistan as an independent state, it was unequivocally proclaimed to be a secular state. Jinnah instructed his people that religion was not to be the business of the state and that each and every individual will be free to go to their mosques, temples or synagogue. Unfortunately for Pakistan and the world at large, (hundreds of Pakistan related atrocities could have been avoided, if Jinnah had succeeded), Jinnah passed away before he had the chance to put his words into practice.
Not many years after Jinnah’s death we received our first Satan incarnate Liaquat Ali khan who promulgated Islam to be the religion of Pakistan in the constitution. It has been all downhill since then.
Liaquat was shot dead not long after his promulgation, after which the new country was subjected to abuse from several power brokers.
Almost all of those power usurpers, secularist or openly Islamist, used Islam as the shield to elongate their stint in power. They either did not know or did not care that Islamic ideology can simply be described as a cancer. Once it is unleashed it simply begins to takes over. It encroaches in all aspects of life and fights off violently any attempts at limiting or eliminating it.
In order to provide balanced perspective I must add here that Americas penchant for reigning supreme and bringing down soviet union was also instrumental in spreading this cancer in Pakistani society, but this must also be qualified with the fact that the primary culprits were Pakistani leaders and Pakistani society as without their connivance America may have moved on to find different theaters of action.
Once American objectives were met, it moved on leaving the illness behind. Tariq Ali describes this action quite aptly as using Pakistan like a condom.
This illness is now spreading fast and threatening to consume not only Pakistan but India and the rest of the world as well. The people of Pakistan are only half heartedly fighting this battle. They share the same religion and the same scriptures and sympathize with what the barbarians are trying to accomplish. Islam is impractical and medieval. The scriptures forbid all progress and curtail freedom. They forbid rational thought and turn humans into zombies. The mind numbing rituals hamper normal life and extinguish all critical thinking. Hence we have a population which is falling fast into hypocrisy and ‘double think’ of mega proportion. Let me qualify this. According to Islamic scriptures the following things are forbidden:
Garlic
Banking
Stock market trading
Music
Pictures (TV, Cinemas are all banned according to Zakir Naik and all other scholars) and any art forms except for perhaps quranic calligraphy
Eyebrows plucking or hair dying or hair replacement for women.
Women traveling without Mahram (close related male like brother, husband, father)
Women’s right for divorce (no power can grant divorce to a woman until the husband okays it)
Women showing their faces or any part of their bodies
Women’s mixed education
Women working in a mixed environment
Restriction on marriage age for child girls
Trading or being friendly with the non-believers
This little list is not exhaustive. How can one live in this world with the rest of civilization and still call themselves a Muslim. The majority of Pakistanis do not live like that. The result is that accepting Islam as a way of life produces a whole army of hypocrites. But this is not the end of the matter because once you are in there is no way out…
Islam has inbuilt mechanisms which protect it from being tampered with or to bring it into the 21st century. It also prescribes capital punishment for blasphemers and apostates. Hence no serious or independent discussion of Islam can take place. The participants showing any critical thinking are immediately threatened with their life. Just watch some Pakistani programmers which are attempting to ignite debate and watch participants cowed in fear and openly sugar coating their answers to protect the lies of Islam.
Muslims have killed their consciousness to repeat the same answers to difficult questions.
Why did Muhammad rape a child? Ans. Kids achieved puberty at an early age in those days.
Why did Muhammad rape captives of war? Ans. It was the custom in those days.
Why did Muhammad rob? Ans. To get compensated for his loss upon migration.
Why did Muhammad kill innocent people of Bani Qurayza? Ans. It wasn’t him, it was Allah.
Why did Muhammad commit incest by marrying his daughter in law? Ans. To get rid of a bad custom of people treating their adopted children as their own.
Why did Muhammad deal in slave trade? Ans. To regulate the trade.
Why did Muhammad torture the chief of Jewish tribe Kinana for information of hidden treasure, couldn’t his all knowing Allah help him out? Allah did not wish to interfere.
Why did Muhammad eat the poisoned mutton shoulder and claimed that it was this which had killed him 3 years later? Ans. Don’t ask. Only Allah knows.
Why did Muhammad leave Islam in such a violent mess that 3 subsequent khalifa were killed in a brutal manner by Muslims themselves? Ans. Muhammad left a perfect religion but people have not followed it properly.
Pakistan is in dire straits. Pakistani people must face certain realities. India did not start the wars, and did not lose the wars. Our curricula history books tell lies.
Read independent history.
India did not break up East Pakistan . Our racist exploitation was the cause
Islam is not a peaceful religion. Read your scriptures and read mullahs diatribe for past few centuries uptil present time to connect the dots.
The world is not conspiring against the ‘citadel of Islam’ called Pakistan .
Pakistan IS NOT the citadel of Islam. We must look at ourselves for our depravity.
The people must pluck up courage and make a collective effort to read their own scriptures and then either jettison this cult out of their life or at least to send it into their private domain. Unless and until they do that, this descent into chaos will continue.
Dr Omar Zia
Pakistan
Do you have friends?